|
1
|
- David G. Hodgdon, Ph.D.
- Director of Curriculum & Instruction
|
|
2
|
- Highlight the features of the junior high and middle school concepts
- Focus on needs of middle-level students
- Examine data on middle-level education
|
|
3
|
- “There is a crucial need to help adolescents at this early age to
acquire a durable basis for self-esteem, flexible and inquiring minds,
reliable and close human relationships, a sense of belonging in a valued
group, and a way of being useful beyond one’s self.”
|
|
4
|
- Committee of Ten on Secondary School Studies (1893 recommendations)
- Increase average age of freshmen entering Harvard
- Recommend 6 years elementary, 6 secondary
- Nature of junior high schools – focused on growth and development of
young adolescents, transition to high school, often final level of
formal education in many communities
|
|
5
|
- Post-World War II
- Junior highs became prominent
- Little high schools
- Academic departments
- Promotion based on subjects
- Rigid grouping patterns
- Program shaped by high school and beyond
|
|
6
|
- Emergence of Middle Schools
- Racial desegregation
- Overcrowding in elementary schools and high schools
- Seminal studies (particularly Turning Points: Preparing American Youth
for the 21st Century by the Carnegie Council on Adolescent
Development in 1989)
|
|
7
|
- “Middle grade schools – junior high, intermediate, or middle schools –
are potentially society’s most powerful force to recapture millions of
youth adrift.”
|
|
8
|
- Subject-centered vs. student-centered curriculum
- “All young adolescents should have the opportunity to succeed in every
aspect of the middle grade program, regardless of previous achievement
or the pace at which they learn.”
(Turning Points)
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- “As the schools in the study [by Robert D. Felner from the University of
Rhode Island] implemented more of Turning Points’ recommended practices
and did so with greater fidelity, their students’ scores on standardized
tests of mathematics, language arts, and reading achievement increased
significantly.” (Turning Points
2000)
|
|
11
|
- Individual approach to teaching vs. teaming approach
- “Teaming provides an environment conducive to learning by reducing the
stress of anonymity and isolation on students.”
- Forging stable relationships
- Supporting intellectual & interpersonal development
- Improving behavior
- Bolstering peer grgoup affiliation
|
|
12
|
- Locked vs. flexible schedule
- 50-minute timeframe on daily basis vs. longer or shorter blocks
determined by teams
- Single discipline vs. interdisciplinary/thematic units
- More vs. less specialization
|
|
13
|
- “The main purpose of middle grade education is to promote young
adolescents’ intellectual development.
It is to enable every student to think creatively, to identify
and solve meaningful problems, to communicate and work well with others,
and to develop the base of factual knowledge and skills that is the
essential foundation for these ‘higher order’ capacities.” (Turning
Points 2000).
|
|
14
|
- Static class size vs. large and small group instruction (determined by
team)
- Homogeneous grouping vs. diverse grouping practices
- “The key [to reducing homogeneous grouping] is redesigning instruction,
curriculum, and assessment. You
need to put mixed ability groups together systematically to ensure true
heterogeneous composition. Staff
development is critical with training in open-ended projects,
compacting curriculum, performance-based assessments, differentiated
assignments and grading standards. . .” (NMSA Research Summary)
|
|
15
|
- “Many elementary and middle schools have taken the position that
well-designed heterogeneous classes can meet the needs of most
intellectually gifted students.
But many schools also provide special activities for high
achievers either within the regular classroom or after school. Most schools report success with this
approach – but only after considerable time and work with parents.” [Oakes, J. (1992). Detracking schools: Early lessons from
the field. Phi Delta Kappan,
73(6), 448-454.]
|
|
16
|
- Static vs. flexible grouping patterns
- Grouping temporary and identified as needed by team
- Lecture approach vs. varied instructional strategies
- Authentic & differentiated instruction
- Interscholastics & intramurals
|
|
17
|
- Individual vs. common planning time
- “The center’s [National Center for Public Education and Social Policy]
ongoing research suggests that when teams have adequate planning time,
they are better able to integrate curriculum across subject areas;
coordinate student assignments, assessments, and other aspects of
instruction; involve parents in their children’s education; involve
parents in their children’s education; and contact health and other
services to address behavior issues or other concerns that affect
learning. . .” (Turning Points 2000)
|
|
18
|
- Centralized guidance department vs. team-based guidance and advisory
program
- “. . .every student needs at least one thoughtful adult who has the
time and takes the trouble to talk with the student about academic
matters, personal problems, and the importance of performing well in
the middle grade school.” (Turning Points)
- Sense of community & team cohesiveness
- Help and guide students with needs (trusting relationship)
- Conflict resolution
- Participate in activities that are part of school functioning (peer
tutoring, peer counseling, planning activities, social functions)
- Lecture approach vs. varied instructional strategies
- Authentic & differentiated instruction
- Interscholastics & intramurals
|
|
19
|
- Centralized/departmentalized vs. shared leadership & decision-making
- “While the principal provides some leadership, a successful team
depends on leadership from within.
The principal, no matter how supportive and involved, is not a
team member and will not be there each day as a team gets down to
business. Teams must lead and
manage themselves, not only out of necessity, but also to deepen their
sense of ownership and commitment to the work of the team.” (Turning
Points 2000)
- Decentralized
- Emphasis on teams rather than departments
- Team leaders rather than department heads
|
|
20
|
- Improved discipline
- Positively affected student emotional health, creativity, and confidence
- Improved faculty morale and support
- Reduction of teacher isolation in interdisciplinary team organization
- Extensive staff development
- Positive parental involvement and support
- Improved community and media support
- George, P., & Shewey, K. (1994).
New evidence for the middle school. Columbus, Ohio: National Middle
School Association.
|
|
21
|
- Met with junior high teachers on monthly basis for more than year
(including early release time to work on coordination of curriculum
- Resumption of meetings begun a number of years ago
- Discussed a range of issues from curriculum to junior high organization
- Several recommendations made that consistent with items discussed in
this presentation
|
|
22
|
- Move toward more curriculum coordination and required interdisciplinary
projects involving a number of subject areas
- Staff development focused on unique needs of students at the middle
level
- Junior high school/high school separation
- Provide homeroom to set up advisory system
- Provide teams of teachers and common planning time
- Improve and enhance communication between home and school
- Improve transitions
- Address health education for junior high students
|
|
23
|
- Website on www.mrsd.org
- Includes National Middle School Association (NMSA) website
- New England League of Middle Schools (NELMS) Association website
- Exemplary middle schools website
- Schools-to-watch website
- Brochure and other items (such as this PowerPoint presentation)
|
|
24
|
- “America’s challenge in preparing its youth is truly a formidable
task. But many proven and
promising solutions exist. We do
not lack the knowledge to transform the education of young
adolescents. What we need is the
leadership and the will.” (Turning
Points)
|