|
Budget Committee/School Board Budget Work Session Monadnock Regional Middle School/High School Library ( Present ¨
Budget Committee: Dick Bauries, Jim Ells, Jane Fortson, Neil
Moriarty, Tom Parker, Bob Smith, Eric Stanley, George Tremblay, ¨
School Board:
Jim Carnie, Karen Cota, Colline Dreyfuss, Bill Felton, John Kenyon,
Bruce McCulley, Susan Oerman (Troy school board nominee), Tim Peloquin,
Phyllis Peterson, Bruce Tatro, Gene White, Absent ¨
Budget Committee:
Don Arguin, Andy Bueckner, Normand Dion, Rob Mitchell, Steve Russell,
John Tommila, ¨
School Board:
Tim Aho, Ken Colby, Jason Hill, Charles Johnson, ¨
SAU Administrators:
Ken Dassau (Superintendent), David Hodgdon (Assistant Superintendent),
Katie Chambers (Business Manager), Tom Warner (Technology Director) ¨
Principals:
Kim Carter, Karen Craig, David Dahl, David Mousette, Sikander Rashid,
Joe Smith, Betty Tatro, Matt Young |
|
|
Agenda Item |
Action Taken or Information Shared |
|
Introduction |
¨
Ken
Dassau introduced the day’s activities. He especially encouraged both the
school board and the budget committee to come to an agreement about a budget
that will drive education rather than regarding the default budget as the
standard. ¨
Katie
reviewed the first sheet in the budget, a summary of each school, and a
function level report for each school.
The bottom line is in the 09 section. ¨
Ken
introduced Susan Oerman as the nominee for the vacant ¨
Neil
would like revision control. He asked
to have dates on all documents, to
make sure that people stay on topic, and to remember that this work session
is an information gathering process.
He also wanted questions written separately at the end of the minutes. |
|
Northern Schools |
¨
David
Mousettte began the process with Gilsum.
He provided background on the schools.
During the summer the school lost 13 students for various
reasons. He indicates that this is a
level-funded budget. ¨
Topics Based on Questions: the impact of
the charter school and the Surry withdrawal committee, the sharing of
personnel, a drop in enrollment, insurance for charter school students using
the school, the extent to which the increase is going directly for students,
the impact of the budget on books, supplies, and such, and the number of
students from each town in the northern schools. ¨
Neil
suggested write-ups on big ticket items in the district. |
|
|
¨
Sikander
Rashid expressed his appreciation to seeing the budget figures on an ongoing
basis. He highlighted the changes in
the Cutler budget be combining special education and the collaborative
program. ¨
Topics Based On Questions:
the number of students in the collaborative, the use of the trailer,
planning for an increase in the student population, the impact of the budget
on books and supplies, the number of new staff members, and the percentage
increase in the bottom line. |
|
|
¨
Betty
Taro explained that the proposed budget increased by 18%. It includes two
aides hired last year and 4 aides this year.
She was seeking two additional teachers, who had been cut in previous
years, to support an increased enrollment in the school. She was also trying to recoup technology. She pointed out that, when an auditory
trainer was needed during the summer, its cost was covered from other
areas. There is a 30-student increase
this year, because of an increase in enrollment each year of 8 to 10
students. ¨
Topics Based On Questions: not promoting special education
students to the next grade each year, the average class size in second and
third grade and the reduction in class size with two additional teachers, the
benefits of moving teachers from third grade to first grade to keep the class
size smaller in first grade, the effects of the budget on books, supplies, and
such, the kindergarten proposal brought forward during the budget process
last year, the procedure for working with principals on the school budgets,
the available space in the building when the school had an enrollment 20%
higher than the current enrollment, the parity among schools regarding the
use of facilities and services, the problem with funding education in the
state, and the implication on the voters of a 20% increase to their
taxes. Ken Dassau clarified that the
increase overall in the budget is 7.7%.
|
|
|
¨
Karen
Craig appreciated the time the budget committee and board members had
invested in the day. She spoke about the necessity to provide resources to
make AYP and the cost to educate our students. The percentage is higher than what she
would like to see – most of it related to benefits. She explained the changes in reading
because a grant was covering part of the cost of the reading teacher rather
than a full special education teacher, as in the past. She agreed with all day kindergarten and
worried about the number of students entering preschool with profound
problems requiring special education services. ¨
Topics Based On Questions:
considering a collaborative program for k-3 or 1-3, the impact of the
budget on books, supplies, and such, the number of new staff members, the
cost of support staff, the nature of and need for before school
programs. ¨
There
was a 10-minute break at |
|
|
¨
David
Dahl thanked those at the meeting, commending them for their commitment to
education. He focused on the
importance of early intervention, explaining that ¨
Topics Based On Questions:
clarification on the district autism program, the reason for the
stipends, the concerns about the schools trying to reach students before they
enter the school and the potential costs, the substitute costs, the reasons
for using subs, and the concern about paying teachers for professional
development and paying for the sub as well, the concern about the impact of
reducing paraprofessionals, the number of students in the autism program, the
funding for federal mandates, the number of special education students, and a
question about class size. |
|
|
¨
Matt
Young thanked the members present for the opportunity to review the budget
with them. The increase in the
Monadnock Regional Middle School (MRMS) budget was related to personnel. The amount not directly related to
personnel was $50,000 (for example, $5000 for extracurricular activities such
as intramurals to address the goals of enhancing students’ civic and social
responsibilities and providing for audiovisual items for school through the
library). He pointed out that the
school was in a good position because of
the budget last year, when it was initially split out between the
middle school and high school. ¨
Topics Based On Questions:
whether or not the middle school was receiving students unable to read
and write at least at a 6th-grade level, the nature of the reading
program, the impact of the budget on books, supplies, and such, the cost of the HT program to Washington,
D.C. the discrepancy in allocations between the physical education program
and the athletic program, the reasons for the special education director to
be in the administrative account rather than the special education
account, the implications of the lack
of space on the physical education program,
the listing of “vacant” on the personnel sheets, the number of
secretaries for the principal, the reasons for the autism teacher to leave,
the decrease in middle school numbers, the technology needs, the number of
autism students and the use of the classroom, an explanation summer school
line items, and the expansion of summer school. |
|
|
¨
Kim
Carter indicated that she appreciated the time and the thoughtfulness
invested in this process. She pointed
out that most of you have heard her speak about MC2 issues, that what is
missing because of default budget is growth of school. She emphasized that, if we look only at
expenditures, we would see that spending for 2004-05 and 2005-06 did not
shift appreciably. When she was selected
for the position, she was asked to look at an entrepreneurial model for the
school to invite others to come. She
talked about acknowledging revenues.
The only increases to the MC2 budget were those identified and talked
about baded on the assumption that there was no school choice grant. ¨
Topics Based On Questions:
the problem of the out-of-district students, questions about the true
number of students to anticipate without the grant and the basis of the
budget on 45 students, the limited number of graduating students and the
number of fifth year students, the inability to know the answers at this
point, the intersection of philosophical discussions about MC2 with budget
implications, the need to do market studies and market research with other
districts, the revenue issue, the per-pupil cost to the taxpayer if we are
just a small number below the anticipated number of students, the choice
policy and the need for the school board to grapple with the continuation of
programs for existing students, the value of the number of students Kim is
working with (according to Katie), the likelihood of the grant being renewed,
the need for the administration and school board to consider how to run MC2
for less money, adequate charges for tuition (especially considering IEP
expenses), transportation, the sharing of custodial services. |
|
|
¨ Joe Smith highlighted the NEASC
results. The committee voted on
commendations and recommendations, a few of which Joe shared. He mentioned moving from a ¨ Topics Based on Questions: the impact of the budget on books,
supplies, and such, a benefactor to fund the gym floor, the problem with the
auditorium seats, the privacy for the health office, replacing textbooks, the
number of students not graduated from high school, the number of teachers on
the top step, the possibility of
having participants pay for athletics,
the cost of transportation, a
question about a slow-down by the teachers because of negotiations, the role
of department heads, the aides line and guidance line discrepancies, the distinction between a contract teacher
and a regular teacher, other staff not charged to high school, the number of
secretaries, and the decrease of almost 100 students in enrollment and the
need to take that decrease into consideration when deciding the final budget
for the high school. |
|
Technology |
¨ Tom Warner responded to questions
brought up during the school presentations.
He highlighted Marie Szymcik’s position. Marie explained the use of the computers
and the age of them. Tom spoke about
the new data requirements at the state level, the attempt to level-fund the
technology budget, the new IT person, the erate program, and getting services
available to the community free to district. ¨ Topics Based on Questions: offering computer literacy
instruction earlier than at the high school, the placement of technology
integrators in the northern schools, high school and college students to
offer these services at the high school level, and low-cost laptops developed
by MIT. |
|
Maintenance |
¨ Katie Chambers explained the
maintenance budget, emphasizing that she focused on actual expenditures to
build it. For example, the district
never budgeted for repair and maintenance supplies, so there is a new line
item. Katie pointed out that we are
keeping an eye on telephone costs in the maintenance area, that there is a
furniture increase because of lunchroom tables, and increases in elementary
school budgets because of playground issues as a result of the insurance
company survey. ¨ Topics Based on Questions: the $5,000 bids, Mike Pratt’s and Ron Parent’s positions, replacing
of chairs in Troy, telephone service,
replacement of three computers in offices, a ballfield groomer,
vehicle maintenance, replacing the electrician’s utility truck, cutting a
separate line item for table and chair replacement since it wasn’t a usual
cost, and the high school electricity budget.
|
|
District (Special Education,
Improvement of Instruction Services, Other District Accounts) |
¨ Ken Dassau went to the 1200
accounts on page 73. He spoke about
the reduction in special education accounts.
¨ Topics Based on Questions: the cost of a special education
child, the total number of students, the need for buffer to address
additional costs in special education, and contracting large ticket items
like Occupational Therapy. ¨ Dave Hodgdon highlighted
Improvement of Instruction Services.
He pointed out that there was a reduction in the total budget for
these areas, primarily because of reductions in the textbook account and the
data-driven project. ¨ Katie highlighted other district
items. She focused on the following
accounts - payment for those not
accepting health insurance, the tuition line item, reimbursement for loans
for teachers new to the profession. ¨ Topics Based on Questions: the cost for paraprofessionals
under No Child Left Behind (only cost to Title I paraprofessionals), the
insurance buyout, the early retirement issue, the DocStar filing system, a
question about litigation, the Surry issue and legal issues, looking at the
commercial market for health insurance, the cost of legal fees for the
contract and such, and the budgeting of vacancies. |
|
Summary |
¨ Ken thanked both boards and the
prospective board member. ¨ Neil thanked Katie for being
up-to-speed so quickly. |
|
Open Questions |
¨ How much of the increase in the
bottom line for each school goes directly to students? ¨ What is the per-pupil cost for each
school? ¨ Of the students in the northern
schools, how many are from Surry grade by grade? ¨ Have we considered having people
pay for athletics? ¨ What is the breakdown in the costs for
DocStar and is this an ongoing cost? ¨ Is there a possibility of bidding
out Property and Liability? |