Budget Committee Meeting
Non-approved Minutes
May 23, 2006
Mt.
Caesar Elementary
School, Swanzey,
NH
Members present: Jane Fortson, Eric Stanley,
Robert Smith, John Tommila, Thomas Parker, Richard Bauries, Neil Moriarty,
George Tremblay, Jim Ells, Don Arguin and Robert Mitchell. Absent: Richard Thackston, Norman Dion and Andrew Bueckner.
Administrators Present: K. Dassau, Superintendent,
D. Hodgdon, Assistant Superintendent and L. Biron, Business Manager.
1. Approval of the April
26 2006 Minutes: MOTION: J. Fortson
MOVED to accept the April 26, 2006 Minutes as
presented. SECOND: J. Tommila. VOTE: 10.390/0/.815/3.307. Motion passes.
1a.Communications: N. Moriarty commented that
the letter from K. Dassau was in the packets.
2. Public Comments: D. Arguin, speaking as a
citizen, commented on a previous incident that occurred at a Budget Committee
Meeting. He explained that he had been shut off by the chair of the Budget
Committee. He felt that the public should be concerned. He said that the
credibility of the committee should not be flushed down the toilet. He said
that the incident occurred two meetings ago and he was unable to continue with
his point. He also commented that the chair is also on the taxpayers committee,
which he felt is a conflict. E. Stanley said
that he does understand about the not being able to continue but commented that
D. Arguin’s wife works in the district. J. Tommila asked if D. Arguin felt that
the credibility is flushed down the toilet then why serve? D. Arguin said that he would like to make
things better.
3. Status of
paying the committee secretary: N. Moriarty asked that J. Kenyon, the
Board rep. bring this issue back to the Board. K. Dassau commented that she is
being paid when she submits the bill. There is no issue.
4. Sub-Committee Organization: Savings Committee: The Savings Committee has
not met.
4aSub-Committee Reports: Oversight Committee: N. Moriarty reported that K. Dassau was going
to look at the concern about the same person making purchases and signing for
them.
5. Discussion
on Mailing of political documents: N. Moriarty commented that the Budget
Committee felt that B. Tatro bent the rules when a political mailing was sent
from her office. K. Dassau reported that the Board discussed the issue in
length. N. Moriarty asked if the employees have received the message. K. Dassau
reported that everyone is aware. K. Dassau asked if it was the PTO Newsletter
that they were referring to. E. Stanley
commented that it was Notes from B. Tatro’s office. K. Dassau explained that
the employees would be told through the building principals.
6. Application to budget committee to approve the
District to execute Over expenditures per RSA 32-11 section 1: N. Moriarty reviewed the
information from the hand out titled For MRSD Budget Oversight Committee May 1, 2006 Projections.
R. Smith arrives at 7:30 PM.
N. Moriarty asked if anyone had questions
on the hand out. It was asked if there was significance on the Feb. 1, 2006 and the May 1, 2006 dates. N.
Moriarty said that there was not much of significance. R. Mitchell asked why
the Budget Committee was addressing the deficit now. K. Dassau explained that
historically this is the time. He is not sure if there is an optimal process.
L. Biron and K. Dassau came to the Board to ask to overspend the deficit of
$210,000.00. R. Bauries commented on the warrant article that informed the
public of the deficit. J. Fortson commented that she asked the Board to rewrite
the article and they did. R. Bauries asked why this deficit was not in the
budget. L. Biron commented that at the time we were not asking the public for
the money. MOTION: J. Fortson MOVED to accept the $570,132
overspending coming from revenue as detailed in the worksheet. SECOND: D. Arguin. DISCUSSION: T. Parker said that he is opposed to this motion. He
said that the $110,000.00 should have come out of the deficit. N. Moriarty
commented that the Budget Committee voted on this amount in a public hearing.
R. Mitchell commented that he is not sure that the committee is not doing what
the voters asked for. R. Mitchell felt that the motion should be approved. N.
Moriarty said that the $210,000.00 is in excess of the budget and just one big
pile of money to use from school to school. T. Parker commented that
statutorily you could not overspend the budget. We should set the example. D.
Arguin commented that we are not the only district with this issue. N. Moriarty
commented that this should have been dealt with much earlier. K. Dassau said
that he asked to meet earlier and thought the Budget committee said to do it
later. J. Fortson said that they wanted to wait. She said that she will approve
and do this but would not expect this to happen again. K. Dassau commented that
some districts under estimate spec. ed. and do this every year. J. Fortson does
not want this to happen again. She suggested that the insurance savings be set
aside for an emergency. She will be saying no to anything next year. R. Bauries
commented that they are overstaffed, to many administrators and enrollment is
dropping. He said that if we rubber stamp it we are just as bad as they are.
The taxpayers have been very good over the years. He said that if we rubber
stamp it we are not doing our jobs. E. Stanley
asked about the insurance. J. Fortson explained that it would reflect next
year. R. Mitchell commented that too much staff and fat in the budget are good
topics at budget time. He said that this is not the time or the place. J.
Fortson commented that the spending has been frozen and steps have been taken.
She said that Spec. Ed. is a wild card and the septic is not a problem. R. Mitchell asked how he would
know that this would not happen again. L. Biron explained that the Budget
Committee cut out $1 million dollars plus out of the budget and we are coming
in at less than $210,000.00. He said that the Budget Committee should be
patting them on the back. J. Fortson asked to move the question. R. Bauries
commented that this is not a cut in the budget but in the increase. K. Dassau
explained that the RSA allows you the right to grant this. T. Parker read RSA 32:11(b).
He explained that if it is overspent you might be taken to court. J. Fortson
asked to move the question. VOTE: 6.70/5.993/0/3.307.
Motion passes.
7. Other discussions as desired: J. Fortson asked about the
initial proposal adjusted warrant for 2006-2007. This issue is still being
revised.
8. Superintendent’s
comments: K. Dassau thanked the Budget Committee for approving the request.
He commented that 2/3rds of the Oversight Committee voted against the motion.
He asked the role of the Oversight Committee. He would request the practice of
the Oversight Committee. R. Bauries asked L. Biron for the vote again. He also
said that if people attended the Oversight Committee meetings they would have
voted this past motion down. J. Ells commented on the fact that L. Biron read
the names of the members and their votes and R. Bauries sat there and shook his
head. R. Bauries said that he would shake his head whenever. N. Moriarty asked
for the commented to go through the chair.
9. Chairman comments: No comments.
10. Public Comment Period: The Budget Committee told
L. Biron that it was nice working with him. The Budget Committee applauded L.
Biron.
11. Set Agenda:
1.
Adopted Budget (if available)
2.
Budget Oversight
3.
Savings (if you would like to be on this committee meet after the
meeting)
12. Motion to adjourn: G. Tremblay MOVED to adjourn the meeting at 8:31 PM. SECOND: E. Stanley. VOTE: Unanimous for those present. Motion
passes.
Respectfully submitted,
Laura L. Aivaliotis
MRSD Recording secretary